Title |
Computationally Secure Oblivious Transfer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Cryptology, October 2004
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00145-004-0102-6 |
Authors |
Moni Naor, Benny Pinkas |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 70 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 28% |
Student > Master | 18 | 24% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 19% |
Unknown | 9 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 46 | 62% |
Engineering | 4 | 5% |
Mathematics | 3 | 4% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,764,724
of 23,051,185 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cryptology
#45
of 238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,253
of 62,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cryptology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,051,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them