Title |
High Ep-CAM Expression is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Node-positive Breast Cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, August 2004
|
DOI | 10.1023/b:brea.0000036787.59816.01 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gilbert Spizzo, Guenther Gastl, Peter Obrist, Philip Went, Stephan Dirnhofer, Susanne Bischoff, Martina Mirlacher, Guido Sauter, Ronald Simon, Shanna Stopatschinskaya, Philip Haas, Rahel Bart, Ossi Robert Köchli, Hanspeter Spichtin, Robert Maurer, Urs Metzger, Brida von Castelberg, Markus Zuber, Friedrich Mross, Holger Dietrich |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 70 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 19% |
Researcher | 13 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 20% |
Unknown | 10 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 20% |
Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 15 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,314,356
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#555
of 4,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,505
of 54,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.