You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An evaluation of factors influencing pore pressure in accretionary complexes: Implications for taper angle and wedge mechanics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Geophysical Research, April 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2005jb003990 |
| Authors |
Demian M. Saffer, Barbara A. Bekins |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 10% |
| Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 68 | 76% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#4,077
of 12,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,086
of 84,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#29
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.