| Title |
Determination of the sedimentary microbial biomass by extractible lipid phosphate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, January 1979
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00388810 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. C. White, W. M. Davis, J. S. Nickels, J. D. King, R. J. Bobbie |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 401 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 381 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 111 | 28% |
| Researcher | 84 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 44 | 11% |
| Unknown | 53 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 117 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 88 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 58 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 4% |
| Engineering | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 5% |
| Unknown | 90 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2017.
All research outputs
#4,764,724
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#977
of 4,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,435
of 26,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.