↓ Skip to main content

‘Four‐hour target’ and its impact

Overview of attention for article published in Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
‘Four‐hour target’ and its impact
Published in
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery, June 2015
DOI 10.1111/ans.13186
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marlon L Perera, Neiraja Gnaneswaran, Matthew J Roberts, Marian Giles, Danny Liew, Peter Ritchie, Steven T F Chan

Abstract

The National Emergency Access Targets (NEAT), introduced in 2012, guides the clearance of emergency department (ED) presentations within 4 h of initial presentation. We aim to assess the impact of NEAT on acute surgical services at a large metropolitan centre. A retrospective cohort study was performed and data were collected from electronic patient management systems. The control group was represented by ED presentations between June and September 2011, 1 year prior to the introduction of NEAT. The two study groups consisted of ED presentations between June and September 2012 and 2013 respectively. Outcome measures included time to appendicectomy and cholecystectomy, inpatient length of stay (IPLOS) (for operative and non-operative cases), out-of-hours operating and hospital mortality rates. In total, 2619 inpatient episodes were included, with a trend showing increasing admissions throughout the study periods (P < 0.001). Time to surgical review and ED length of stay decreased significantly (P < 0.001). Time from emergency presentation to emergency appendicectomy and cholecystectomy remained unchanged and procedures performed out-of-hours increased significantly from 20.9% to 42.9% (P < 0.001). Median IPLOS for operative and non-operative patients was reduced during the study from 2.05 to 1.84 days (P < 0.001). Inter-unit transfers within 48 h of presentation increased significantly from 5.3% to 14.7% (P < 0.001). The early results following the implementation of NEAT have been correlated with increased efficiency in ED clearance and increased burden on surgical operative and inpatient outcomes. While improvements in IPLOS were observed, they must be considered in the context of increased lower-acuity admissions and out-of-hours operating.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 28%
Student > Bachelor 6 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Unknown 13 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2016.
All research outputs
#16,579,551
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery
#1,242
of 2,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,456
of 279,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Surgery
#11
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,617 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.