↓ Skip to main content

Determination of Seasonal Vitamin and Mineral Contents of Sea Bream (Sparus aurata L., 1758) Cultured in Net Cages in Central Black Sea Region

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Trace Element Research, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Determination of Seasonal Vitamin and Mineral Contents of Sea Bream (Sparus aurata L., 1758) Cultured in Net Cages in Central Black Sea Region
Published in
Biological Trace Element Research, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12011-018-1382-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dilara Kaya Öztürk, Birol Baki, İsmihan Karayücel, Recep Öztürk, Gülşen Uzun Gören, Sedat Karayücel

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the seasonal vitamin and mineral contents of sea bream (Sparus aurata) cultured in net cages in Central Black Sea region. The average seasonal A, D3, and E vitamins values in fish meat were between 0.27 ± 0.02-0.60 ± 0.00, 0.98 ± 0.01-1.70 ± 0.00, and 3.10 ± 0.14-6.00 ± 0.21 mg/kg, respectively (p < 0.05). The average seasonal Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Na, P, Zn, and Se values in fish meat were between 276.90 ± 0.99-1788.50 ± 51.27 (p < 0.05), 3.50 ± 0.12-4.47 ± 0.18 (p > 0.05), 4244.50 ± 8.84-4761.50 ± 1.06 (p < 0.05), 251.55 ± 2.55-312.65 ± 11.42 (p < 0.05), 56.49 ± 0.04-128.75 ± 0.18 (p < 0.05), 2234.50 ± 15.20-2619.00 ± 7.07 (p < 0.05), 5.62 ± 0.10-15.30 ± 0.22 (p < 0.05), and 0.30 ± 0.00-0.38 ± 0.01 mg/kg (p > 0.05), respectively. As a result, it can be concluded that sea bream cultured in the Central Black Sea region is a rich source of nutrients in terms of vitamins and mineral matters, and fish size, feed quality, and the environmental factors are influential on the contents of vitamin and mineral substances in the fish tissue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 21%
Environmental Science 2 11%
Unspecified 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Unknown 11 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,610,081
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Biological Trace Element Research
#1,339
of 2,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,121
of 325,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Trace Element Research
#17
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,054 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.