↓ Skip to main content

Engaging with Community Advisory Boards (CABs) in Lusaka Zambia: perspectives from the research team and CAB members

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Engaging with Community Advisory Boards (CABs) in Lusaka Zambia: perspectives from the research team and CAB members
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12910-015-0031-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alwyn Mwinga, Keymanthri Moodley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
Sierra Leone 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 69 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 20 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Arts and Humanities 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 20 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2015.
All research outputs
#14,815,222
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#780
of 993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,783
of 267,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#18
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.