↓ Skip to main content

MEK inhibitor diminishes nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cell growth and NPC-induced osteoclastogenesis via modulating CCL2 and CXCL16 expressions

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
MEK inhibitor diminishes nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cell growth and NPC-induced osteoclastogenesis via modulating CCL2 and CXCL16 expressions
Published in
Tumor Biology, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13277-015-3595-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Zhu, Chunlin Zou, Zhe Zhang, Chao-Nan Qian, Xin Yang, Junlin Shi, Yudui Xia, Jian Zhang, Yi Lu

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a common malignancy in southern China and Southeast Asia. NPC frequently metastasizes to the bone in advanced patients resulting in high mortality. The molecular mechanisms for NPC development and cancer-induced bone lesions are unclear. In this study, we firstly determined chemokine receptor CCR2 and CXCR6 expressions in clinical specimens and CNE2, SUNE1, CNE1, and HK1 cell lines. Then, we measured chemokine CCL2 and CXCL16 production in these NPC cell lines by ELISA. Expression levels of these chemokines and their receptors were observed to positively correlate with tumor aggressiveness. Furthermore, U0126 (MEK inhibitor) was used to treat these NPC cell lines. CCL2 and CXCL16 expression levels and cell proliferation were significantly inhibited by U0126 in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Finally, we collected conditioned medium (CM) from NPC cell cultures in the presence of U0126 treatment. When mouse bone marrow non-adherent cells were treated with the CM, the numbers of multinucleated osteoclast formation were dramatically diminished. These results indicate that MEK inhibitor diminishes NPC cell proliferation and NPC-induced osteoclastogenesis via modulating CCL2 and CXCL16 expressions. This study provides novel therapeutic targets such as CCL2/CCR2 and CXCL16/CXCR6 for advanced NPC patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 33%
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Professor 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2016.
All research outputs
#18,414,796
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,369
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,381
of 266,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#63
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.