↓ Skip to main content

The internal standard diquat-d4 causes errors in diquat analysis by LC–MS/MS

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Toxicology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
The internal standard diquat-d4 causes errors in diquat analysis by LC–MS/MS
Published in
Forensic Toxicology, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11419-018-0423-z
Authors

Yusuke Suzuki, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Koichi Saito

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Chemistry 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,511,777
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Toxicology
#217
of 386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,148
of 326,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Toxicology
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.