↓ Skip to main content

Motivation and satisfaction among community health workers in Morogoro Region, Tanzania: nuanced needs and varied ambitions

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
335 Mendeley
Title
Motivation and satisfaction among community health workers in Morogoro Region, Tanzania: nuanced needs and varied ambitions
Published in
Human Resources for Health, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12960-015-0035-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rose N M Mpembeni, Aarushi Bhatnagar, Amnesty LeFevre, Dereck Chitama, David P Urassa, Charles Kilewo, Rebecca M Mdee, Helen Semu, Peter J Winch, Japhet Killewo, Abdullah H Baqui, Asha George

Abstract

In 2012, the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MOHSW), Tanzania, approved national guidelines and training materials for community health workers (CHWs) in integrated maternal, newborn and child health (Integrated MNCH), with CHWs trained and deployed across five districts of Morogoro Region soon after. To inform future scale up, this study assessed motivation and satisfaction among these CHWs. A survey of all CHWs trained by the Integrated MNCH Programme was conducted in the last quarter of 2013. Motivation and satisfaction were assessed using a five-point Likert scale with 29 and 27 items based on a literature review and discussions with CHW programme stakeholders. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to identify motivation and satisfaction determinants. Out of 238 eligible CHWs, 96 % were included in the study. Findings showed that respondents were motivated to become CHWs due to altruism (work on MNCH, desire to serve God, work hard) and intrinsic needs (help community, improve health, pride) than due to external stimuli (monetary incentives, skill utilization, community respect or hope for employment). CHWs were satisfied by relationships with health workers and communities, job aids and the capacity to provide services. CHWs were dissatisfied with the lack of transportation, communication devices and financial incentives for carrying out their tasks. Factors influencing motivation and satisfaction did not differ across CHW socio-demographic characteristics. Nonetheless, older and less educated CHWs were more likely to be motivated by altruism, intrinsic needs and skill utilization, community respect and hope for employment. Less educated CHWs were more satisfied with service and quality factors and more wealthy CHWs satisfied with job aids. A combination of financial and non-financial incentives is required to support motivation and satisfaction among CHWs. Although CHWs joined mainly due to their altruistic nature, they became discontented with the lack of monetary compensation, transportation and communication support received. With the planned rollout of the national CHW cadre, improved understanding of CHWs as a heterogeneous group with nuanced needs and varied ambitions is vital for ensuring sustainability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the 1 <1%
Unknown 330 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 20%
Researcher 55 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Student > Postgraduate 22 7%
Other 51 15%
Unknown 80 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 25%
Social Sciences 50 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 2%
Other 47 14%
Unknown 97 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#827
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,538
of 280,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#22
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.