↓ Skip to main content

Agents of responsibility in software vulnerability processes

Overview of attention for article published in Ethics and Information Technology, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Agents of responsibility in software vulnerability processes
Published in
Ethics and Information Technology, June 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10676-004-1266-3
Authors

Ari Takanen, Petri Vuorijärvi, Marko Laakso, Juha Röning

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Other 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 17 49%
Psychology 4 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 11%
Philosophy 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Ethics and Information Technology
#246
of 439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,858
of 62,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ethics and Information Technology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.