| Title |
Microchip traps and Bose–Einstein condensation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Physics B, April 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s003400200861 |
| Authors |
J. Reichel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 32% |
| Researcher | 37 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Professor | 11 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 113 | 86% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | <1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 11 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2012.
All research outputs
#8,064,660
of 24,214,995 outputs
Outputs from Applied Physics B
#408
of 1,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,619
of 124,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Physics B
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,214,995 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,582 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.