↓ Skip to main content

Projected gradient methods for linearly constrained problems

Overview of attention for article published in Mathematical Programming, September 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
436 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Projected gradient methods for linearly constrained problems
Published in
Mathematical Programming, September 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf02592073
Authors

Paul H. Calamai, Jorge J. Moré

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Germany 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 134 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 38%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Master 14 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 7%
Professor 8 5%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 16 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 48 33%
Engineering 41 28%
Mathematics 22 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Physics and Astronomy 4 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 17 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,557,454
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Mathematical Programming
#148
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,453
of 12,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mathematical Programming
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.