↓ Skip to main content

Recoding: Dynamic Reprogramming of Translation

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Biochemistry, June 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
311 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recoding: Dynamic Reprogramming of Translation
Published in
Annual Review of Biochemistry, June 1996
DOI 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.003521
Pubmed ID
Authors

R F Gesteland, J F Atkins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Germany 2 2%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 76 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 34%
Researcher 19 23%
Student > Master 5 6%
Professor 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 26%
Unspecified 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 8 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,557,454
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Biochemistry
#818
of 1,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,367
of 27,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Biochemistry
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.