↓ Skip to main content

Which factors differentiate athletes with hip/groin pain from those without? A systematic review with meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
42 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
488 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Which factors differentiate athletes with hip/groin pain from those without? A systematic review with meta-analysis
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, June 2015
DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094602
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea B Mosler, Rintje Agricola, Adam Weir, Per Hölmich, Kay M Crossley

Abstract

Hip and groin injuries are common in many sports. Understanding the factors differentiating athletes with hip/groin pain from those without these injuries could facilitate management and prevention. Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on factors differentiating athletes with and without hip/groin pain. The review was registered as PROSPERO CRD42014007416 and a comprehensive, systematic search was conducted in June 2014. Inclusion criteria were: cross-sectional, cohort or case-control study designs of n>10 that examined outcome measures differentiating athletes with and without hip/groin pain. Two authors independently screened search results, assessed study quality, and performed data extraction. Methodological heterogeneity was determined and data pooled for meta-analysis when appropriate. A best evidence synthesis was performed on the remaining outcome measures. Of 2251 titles identified, 17 articles were included of which 10 were high quality. Sixty two different outcome measures were examined, 8 underwent meta-analysis. Pooled data showed strong evidence that athletes with hip/groin pain demonstrated: pain and lower strength on the adductor squeeze test, reduced range of motion in hip internal rotation and bent knee fall out; however, hip external rotation range was equivalent to controls. Strong evidence was found that lower patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, altered trunk muscle function, and moderate evidence of bone oedema and secondary cleft sign were associated with hip/groin pain. PROs, pain and reduced strength on the adductor squeeze test, reduced range of motion in internal rotation and bent knee fall out are the outcome measures that best differentiate athletes with hip/groin pain from those without this pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 488 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 <1%
Qatar 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 474 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 115 24%
Student > Bachelor 65 13%
Other 49 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 6%
Other 90 18%
Unknown 106 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 146 30%
Sports and Recreations 94 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 89 18%
Unspecified 8 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 1%
Other 27 6%
Unknown 117 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,174,544
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#1,960
of 6,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,060
of 282,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#45
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.