↓ Skip to main content

Transcranial magnetic stimulation for migraine: clinical effects

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Headache and Pain, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
9 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Transcranial magnetic stimulation for migraine: clinical effects
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain, October 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10194-006-0329-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. M. Clarke, A. R. M. Upton, M. V. Kamath, T. Al-Harbi, C. M. Castellanos

Abstract

The objective was to assess the impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on pain and the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in migraine. Forty-two people [mean age 41.43+/-11.69 (SD) years, 36 females] were randomised into high vs. low TMS stimulation groups and received 2 brief pulses of TMS. Thirty-three (33/42) individuals had heart-rate variability assessed, before and after stimulation. No group effects were found. Pain decreased by 75%; 32% of people after 1 treatment reported no headache after 24 h. Mean heart rate decreased from 79.05+/-10.27 to 72.89+/-11.35 beats/min. The low-frequency (LF) and the high-frequency (HF) areas derived from power spectral analyses increased [mean 6522+/-1277 to 8315+/-1009 beats/min(2) (LF) (p=0.001) and mean 5600+/-1568 to 8755+/-3071 beats/min(2) (HF) (p=0.001)]. The LF:HF ratio decreased from mean 1.31+/-0.51 to 1.13+/-0.48 (NS). TMS produces immediate, sustained reductions in pain and modification of the ANS.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 127 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 18%
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Master 12 9%
Other 10 8%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 32%
Neuroscience 17 13%
Psychology 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Engineering 6 5%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 28 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,866,480
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#708
of 1,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,523
of 69,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them