↓ Skip to main content

Fluid–structure Interaction Modeling of Aneurysmal Conditions with High and Normal Blood Pressures

Overview of attention for article published in Computational Mechanics, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Fluid–structure Interaction Modeling of Aneurysmal Conditions with High and Normal Blood Pressures
Published in
Computational Mechanics, May 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00466-006-0065-6
Authors

Ryo Torii, Marie Oshima, Toshio Kobayashi, Kiyoshi Takagi, Tayfun E. Tezduyar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 3 3%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 105 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 28%
Student > Master 18 16%
Researcher 16 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 66 57%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Mathematics 6 5%
Computer Science 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 19 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2012.
All research outputs
#7,557,454
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Computational Mechanics
#78
of 256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,323
of 66,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational Mechanics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 256 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.