↓ Skip to main content

End-tidal carbon dioxide as a measure of arterial carbon dioxide during intermittent mandatory ventilation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Monitoring, April 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
End-tidal carbon dioxide as a measure of arterial carbon dioxide during intermittent mandatory ventilation
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring, April 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf00858353
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew B. Weinger, John E. Brimm

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,557,454
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring
#15
of 74 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,313
of 12,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.