↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac™ and PiCCOplus™ system

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac™ and PiCCOplus™ system
Published in
Critical Care, June 2008
DOI 10.1186/cc6933
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph K Hofer, Alban Senn, Luc Weibel, Andreas Zollinger

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 3%
France 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 139 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 33 22%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Other 36 24%
Unknown 14 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 116 78%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 19 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,397
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,635
of 96,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#14
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.