| Title |
Statistical techniques for modeling of Corylus, Alnus, and Betula pollen concentration in the air
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aerobiologia, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10453-018-9514-x |
| Authors |
Jakub Nowosad, Alfred Stach, Idalia Kasprzyk, Kazimiera Chłopek, Katarzyna Dąbrowska-Zapart, Łukasz Grewling, Małgorzata Latałowa, Anna Pędziszewska, Barbara Majkowska-Wojciechowska, Dorota Myszkowska, Krystyna Piotrowska-Weryszko, Elżbieta Weryszko-Chmielewska, Małgorzata Puc, Piotr Rapiejko, Tomasz Stosik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 21% |
| Professor | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2018.
All research outputs
#14,394,079
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Aerobiologia
#162
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,003
of 296,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aerobiologia
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.