↓ Skip to main content

Iterative polynomial interpolation and data compression

Overview of attention for article published in Numerical Algorithms, March 1993
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 156)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Iterative polynomial interpolation and data compression
Published in
Numerical Algorithms, March 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf02215679
Authors

Morten DÆhlen, Michael Floater

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 33%
Unknown 4 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 67%
Mathematics 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,557,454
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Numerical Algorithms
#20
of 156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,901
of 20,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Numerical Algorithms
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them