| Title |
The dynamic spatial reconstructor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Systems, June 1980
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02222467 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard A. Robb, Arnold H. Lent, Barry K. Gilbert, Aloysius Chu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 64% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,557,454
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#284
of 1,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,638
of 6,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them