| Title |
A process study of the biothermal conversion of water hyacinths to methane
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, April 1988
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02779149 |
| Authors |
R. S. Butner, D. C. Elliott, L. J. Sealock, D. P. Chynoweth |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 36% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 3 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 1997.
All research outputs
#7,557,454
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#544
of 2,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,732
of 13,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,533 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.