↓ Skip to main content

Land-snail faunas in indigenous rainforest and commercial forestry plantations in Kakamega Forest, western Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Land-snail faunas in indigenous rainforest and commercial forestry plantations in Kakamega Forest, western Kenya
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, November 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1013167726704
Authors

Peter Tattersfield, Mary B. Seddon, Charles N. Lange

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Peru 1 2%
Slovakia 1 2%
Unknown 48 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 38%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Professor 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 57%
Environmental Science 12 23%
Computer Science 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,179
of 2,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,659
of 45,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.