| Title |
Comparison of three rodent neuropathic pain models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Experimental Brain Research, February 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02450318 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kwang Jin Kim, Jin Mo Chung |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 20% |
| Researcher | 32 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 34 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 27 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 11% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 39 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,557,454
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#908
of 3,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,175
of 92,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.