| Title |
Production and purification of silicon by calcium reduction of rice-husk white ash
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, December 1985
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00559326 |
| Authors |
P. Mishra, A. Chakraverty, H. D. Banerjee |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Cameroon | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 28% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 14 | 26% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 20% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 11% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,764,956
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#295
of 4,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,847
of 42,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,636 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.