↓ Skip to main content

Zum Wärmeübergang beim Blasensieden von Kohlenwasserstoffen und Halogen-Kältemitteln an einem Glattrohr und einem Hochleistungs-Rippenrohr

Overview of attention for article published in Heat and Mass Transfer, September 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 136)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Zum Wärmeübergang beim Blasensieden von Kohlenwasserstoffen und Halogen-Kältemitteln an einem Glattrohr und einem Hochleistungs-Rippenrohr
Published in
Heat and Mass Transfer, September 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf01589999
Authors

D. Gorenflo, P. Sokol, S. Caplanis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 1997.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Heat and Mass Transfer
#22
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,784
of 16,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heat and Mass Transfer
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them