↓ Skip to main content

HPLC analysis of flavonoids and phenolic acids and aldehydes inEucalyptus spp.

Overview of attention for article published in Chromatographia, December 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
HPLC analysis of flavonoids and phenolic acids and aldehydes inEucalyptus spp.
Published in
Chromatographia, December 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf02267800
Authors

E. Conde, E. Cadahía, M. C. Garcia-Vallejo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 33%
Student > Master 4 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 42%
Chemistry 3 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Decision Sciences 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,503,741
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Chromatographia
#137
of 1,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,457
of 78,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chromatographia
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them