↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation With Pulsed Electric Fields An Ultra-Rapid, Tissue-Selective Modality for Cardiac Ablation

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
68 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
Title
Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation With Pulsed Electric Fields An Ultra-Rapid, Tissue-Selective Modality for Cardiac Ablation
Published in
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, May 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.04.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivek Y. Reddy, Jacob Koruth, Pierre Jais, Jan Petru, Ferdinand Timko, Ivo Skalsky, Robert Hebeler, Louis Labrousse, Laurent Barandon, Stepan Kralovec, Moritoshi Funosako, Boochi Babu Mannuva, Lucie Sediva, Petr Neuzil

Abstract

The authors report the first acute clinical experience of atrial fibrillation ablation with PEF-both epicardial box lesions during cardiac surgery, and catheter-based PV isolation. Standard energy sources rely on time-dependent conductive heating/cooling and ablate all tissue types indiscriminately. Pulsed electric field (PEF) energy ablates nonthermally by creating nanoscale pores in cell membranes. Potential advantages for atrial fibrillation ablation include: 1) cardiomyocytes have among the lowest sensitivity of any tissue to PEF-allowing tissue selectivity, thereby minimizing ablation of nontarget collateral tissue; 2) PEF is delivered rapidly over a few seconds; and 3) the absence of coagulative necrosis obviates the risk of pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis. PEF ablation was performed using a custom over-the-wire endocardial catheter for percutaneous transseptal PV isolation, and a linear catheter for encircling the PVs and posterior left atrium during concomitant cardiac surgery. Endocardial voltage maps were created pre- and post-ablation. Continuous and categorical data are summarized and presented as mean ± SD and frequencies. At 2 centers, 22 patients underwent ablation under general anesthesia: 15 endocardial and 7 epicardial. Catheter PV isolation was successful in all 57 PVs in 15 patients (100%) using 3.26 ± 0.5 lesions/PV: procedure time 67 ± 10.5 min, catheter time (PEF catheter entry to exit) 19 ± 2.5 min, total PEF energy delivery time <60 s/patient, and fluoroscopy time 12 ± 4.0 min. Surgical box lesions were successful in 6 of 7 patients (86%) using 2 lesions/patient. The catheter time for epicardial ablation was 50.7 ± 19.5 min. There were no complications. These data usher in a new era of tissue-specific, ultrarapid ablation of atrial fibrillation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 149 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 16%
Other 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Master 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 45 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 38%
Engineering 14 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 57 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#623,976
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#70
of 1,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,693
of 340,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#3
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.