↓ Skip to main content

Beyond user experimentation: notational-based systematic evaluation of interaction techniques in virtual reality environments

Overview of attention for article published in Virtual Reality, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Beyond user experimentation: notational-based systematic evaluation of interaction techniques in virtual reality environments
Published in
Virtual Reality, February 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10055-005-0151-7
Authors

Emmanuel Dubois, Luciana P. Nedel, Carla M. Dal Sasso. Freitas, Liliane Jacon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 31 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Professor 6 18%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 21 62%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2013.
All research outputs
#7,557,454
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Virtual Reality
#123
of 354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,799
of 59,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virtual Reality
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them