| Title |
Adventitious root growth and ginsenoside accumulation in Panax ginseng cultures as affected by methyl jasmonate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biotechnology Techniques, November 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10529-004-3183-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yun-soo Kim, Eun-joo Hahn, Hosakatte Niranjana Murthy, Kee-yoeup Paek |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 23% |
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2013.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology Techniques
#831
of 2,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,630
of 74,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology Techniques
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,763 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.