↓ Skip to main content

Comparative cytochemical and pharmacological studies on the cholinergic innervation of the branchial heart of the cephalopodSepia officinalis (L.)

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, January 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Comparative cytochemical and pharmacological studies on the cholinergic innervation of the branchial heart of the cephalopodSepia officinalis (L.)
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, January 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf01975878
Authors

R. Schipp, H. R. Schmidt, A. Fiedler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Researcher 2 40%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 60%
Environmental Science 1 20%
Chemistry 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#2,146
of 5,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,973
of 42,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.