↓ Skip to main content

A new similarity computing method based on concept similarity in Chinese text processing

Overview of attention for article published in Science China Information Sciences, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
A new similarity computing method based on concept similarity in Chinese text processing
Published in
Science China Information Sciences, August 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11432-008-0103-4
Authors

Jing Peng, DongQing Yang, ShiWei Tang, TengJiao Wang, Jun Gao

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Lecturer 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 40%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 20%
Computer Science 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Science China Information Sciences
#116
of 328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,126
of 98,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Information Sciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them