| Title |
A Critical View of Context
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Computer Vision, April 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11263-006-7538-0 |
| Authors |
Lior Wolf, Stanley Bileschi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| China | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 38% |
| Researcher | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 64 | 59% |
| Engineering | 13 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,557,454
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Vision
#399
of 1,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,646
of 67,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Vision
#15
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.