↓ Skip to main content

Your worst enemy could be your best friend: predator contributions to invasion resistance and persistence of natives

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Your worst enemy could be your best friend: predator contributions to invasion resistance and persistence of natives
Published in
Oecologia, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00442-009-1475-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven A. Juliano, L. Philip Lounibos, Naoya Nishimura, Krystle Greene

Abstract

Native predators are postulated to have an important role in biotic resistance of communities to invasion and community resilience. Effects of predators can be complex, and mechanisms by which predators affect invasion success and impact are understood for only a few well-studied communities. We tested experimentally whether a native predator limits an invasive species' success and impact on a native competitor for a community of aquatic insect larvae in water-filled containers. The native mosquito Aedes triseriatus alone had no significant effect on abundance of the invasive mosquito Aedes albopictus. The native predatory midge Corethrella appendiculata, at low or high density, significantly reduced A. albopictus abundance. This effect was not caused by trait-mediated oviposition avoidance of containers with predators, but instead was a density-mediated effect caused by predator-induced mortality. The presence of this predator significantly reduced survivorship of the native species, but high predator density also significantly increased development rate of the native species when the invader was present, consistent with predator-mediated release from interspecific competition with the invader. Thus, a native predator can indirectly benefit its native prey when a superior competitor invades. This shows the importance of native predators as a component of biodiversity for both biotic resistance to invasion and resilience of a community perturbed by successful invasion.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Mexico 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 117 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 28%
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Master 11 9%
Professor 8 6%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 12 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 58%
Environmental Science 21 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 19 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2010.
All research outputs
#3,034,912
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#577
of 4,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,141
of 93,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.