↓ Skip to main content

A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates

Overview of attention for article published in Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, February 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
701 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates
Published in
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, February 1999
DOI 10.1007/bf01197708
Authors

A. J. Booker, J. E. Dennis, P. D. Frank, D. B. Serafini, V. Torczon, M. W. Trosset

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
France 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 237 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 36%
Researcher 42 16%
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Professor 12 5%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 26 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 125 49%
Computer Science 29 11%
Mathematics 20 8%
Physics and Astronomy 7 3%
Chemical Engineering 6 2%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 48 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
#91
of 403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,693
of 102,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 403 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them