| Title |
Artemisia annua L.: a source of novel antimalarial drugs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, October 1990
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01980041 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Herman J. Woerdenbag, Charles B. Lugt, Niesko Pras |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Guatemala | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Unknown | 14 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 1997.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#632
of 1,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,462
of 14,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them