Title |
Improving Tenoxicam Solubility and Bioavailability by Cosolvent System
|
---|---|
Published in |
AAPS PharmSciTech, February 2009
|
DOI | 10.1208/s12249-009-9189-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ming-Kung Yeh, Li-Chien Chang, Andy Hong-Jey Chiou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Lecturer | 5 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 18% |
Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 26 | 39% |
Chemistry | 8 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 18 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,680,761
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from AAPS PharmSciTech
#211
of 1,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,070
of 93,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS PharmSciTech
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,467 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.