| Title |
Cost models for future software life cycle processes: COCOMO 2.0
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Software Engineering, December 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02249046 |
| Authors |
Barry Boehm, Bradford Clark, Ellis Horowitz, Chris Westland, Ray Madachy, Richard Selby |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 252 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 61 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 57 | 21% |
| Unknown | 42 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 161 | 58% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 23 | 8% |
| Engineering | 22 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 4% |
| Unknown | 53 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,687,335
of 23,390,392 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Software Engineering
#3
of 12 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,684
of 79,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Software Engineering
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,390,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them