| Title |
Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activity of TiO2 / Methylcellulose nanocomposite films derived from nanopowder TiO2 and modified sol–gel titania
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-006-1149-6 |
| Authors |
Mohammad Hossein Habibi, Mojtaba Nasr-Esfahani, Terry A. Egerton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 9 | 28% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 16% |
| Engineering | 4 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,557,454
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#940
of 4,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,178
of 76,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#14
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,636 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.