You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide association study identifies novel genetic variants contributing to variation in blood metabolite levels
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms8208 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harmen H. M. Draisma, René Pool, Michael Kobl, Rick Jansen, Ann-Kristin Petersen, Anika A. M. Vaarhorst, Idil Yet, Toomas Haller, Ayşe Demirkan, Tõnu Esko, Gu Zhu, Stefan Böhringer, Marian Beekman, Jan Bert van Klinken, Werner Römisch-Margl, Cornelia Prehn, Jerzy Adamski, Anton J. M. de Craen, Elisabeth M. van Leeuwen, Najaf Amin, Harish Dharuri, Harm-Jan Westra, Lude Franke, Eco J. C. de Geus, Jouke Jan Hottenga, Gonneke Willemsen, Anjali K. Henders, Grant W. Montgomery, Dale R. Nyholt, John B. Whitfield, Brenda W. Penninx, Tim D. Spector, Andres Metspalu, P. Eline Slagboom, Ko Willems van Dijk, Peter A. C. ‘t Hoen, Konstantin Strauch, Nicholas G. Martin, Gert-Jan B. van Ommen, Thomas Illig, Jordana T. Bell, Massimo Mangino, Karsten Suhre, Mark I. McCarthy, Christian Gieger, Aaron Isaacs, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Dorret I. Boomsma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Greece | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Philippines | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 206 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 50 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
| Professor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 16% |
| Unknown | 38 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,655,374
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#30,493
of 58,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,562
of 280,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#335
of 771 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 771 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.