↓ Skip to main content

A unified geometric rule for designing nanomagnetism in graphene

Overview of attention for article published in Nano Research, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
A unified geometric rule for designing nanomagnetism in graphene
Published in
Nano Research, December 2008
DOI 10.1007/s12274-008-8053-0
Authors

Decai Yu, Elizabeth M. Lupton, H. J. Gao, Chao Zhang, Feng Liu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 22 47%
Materials Science 7 15%
Chemistry 5 11%
Engineering 4 9%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2011.
All research outputs
#7,557,454
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Nano Research
#362
of 3,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,976
of 166,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.