| Title |
Executive Functions, Self-Regulation, and Chronic Pain: A Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12160-009-9096-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lise Solberg Nes, Abbey R. Roach, Suzanne C. Segerstrom |
| Abstract |
Chronic pain conditions are complicated and challenging to live with. Capacity to adjust to such conditions may depend on the ability to self-regulate, that is, the ability to alter thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Self-regulation appears to rely on executive cognitive functions, and the current review, therefore, sought to draw attention to the impact of self-regulatory capacity and executive functions on chronic pain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Belgium | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 284 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 24% |
| Researcher | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 57 | 19% |
| Unknown | 44 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 148 | 48% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Unknown | 67 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,146,426
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#337
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,065
of 93,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.