↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular Disease in the Nation’s Capital: How Policy and the Built Environment Contribute to Disparities in CVD Risk Factors in Washington, D.C.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Cardiovascular Disease in the Nation’s Capital: How Policy and the Built Environment Contribute to Disparities in CVD Risk Factors in Washington, D.C.
Published in
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40615-018-0497-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phillip Mauller, Lauren A. Doamekpor, Crystal Reed, Kweisi Mfume

Abstract

On average, Washington D.C. residents experience low levels of cardiovascular disease (CVD) behavioral risk factors compared to the rest of the country. Despite presenting as a city of low risk, CVD mortality is higher than the national average. Driving this inconsistency are vast racial disparities as Black D.C. residents die from CVD at a much higher rate than their White counterparts. A closer examination of the data also reveals significant disparities between White and Black populations with regard to behavioral risk factors. Segregation and the built environments of sections of the city with large Black populations may be contributing to risk factor disparities. We examine factors in those built environments that contribute to disparities and assess the intentionality and effectiveness of policies focused on food access, physical activity, and tobacco use implemented between 2003 and 2014. We found that D.C. enacted few policies intentionally designed to reduce barriers in the physical environment that contributed to disparate outcomes, and the few that were implemented showed mixed results in their levels of effectiveness. Our findings demonstrated that both racial and geographical disparities have persisted for more than a decade and half. It is possible that the formation of intentional policies may help reduce barriers in the physical environment and disparate CVD outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 9 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Sports and Recreations 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 12 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,225,009
of 25,400,630 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#292
of 1,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,631
of 340,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,400,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.