↓ Skip to main content

Methodological remarks on rearing basal Attini ants in the laboratory for biological and evolutionary studies: overview of the genus Mycetophylax

Overview of attention for article published in Insectes Sociaux, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Methodological remarks on rearing basal Attini ants in the laboratory for biological and evolutionary studies: overview of the genus Mycetophylax
Published in
Insectes Sociaux, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00040-011-0160-3
Authors

D. C. Cardoso, M. P. Cristiano, M. G. Tavares

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 18%
Other 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Unspecified 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 5 23%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 64%
Unspecified 2 9%
Mathematics 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,666,915
of 23,339,727 outputs
Outputs from Insectes Sociaux
#328
of 976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,546
of 110,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insectes Sociaux
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,339,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them