↓ Skip to main content

Materials issues in nuclear-waste management

Overview of attention for article published in JOM, September 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Materials issues in nuclear-waste management
Published in
JOM, September 2000
DOI 10.1007/s11837-000-0183-0
Authors

Man-Sung Yim, K. Linga Murty

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 27%
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Student > Master 7 11%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 16 26%
Chemistry 9 15%
Materials Science 9 15%
Chemical Engineering 3 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 18 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2013.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#334
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,802
of 37,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.