↓ Skip to main content

Reevaluating suitable habitat for reintroductions: lessons learnt from the eastern barred bandicoot recovery program

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Conservation, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reevaluating suitable habitat for reintroductions: lessons learnt from the eastern barred bandicoot recovery program
Published in
Animal Conservation, March 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00320.x
Authors

C. N. Cook, D. G. Morgan, D. J. Marshall

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 95 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Student > Master 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 50%
Environmental Science 24 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2009.
All research outputs
#6,309,401
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Animal Conservation
#684
of 1,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,370
of 99,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Conservation
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.