↓ Skip to main content

Individual Differences in Executive Functioning: Implications for Stress Regulation

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
324 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Individual Differences in Executive Functioning: Implications for Stress Regulation
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12160-009-9100-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paula G. Williams, Yana Suchy, Holly K. Rau

Abstract

Executive functioning (EF) refers to the set of neurocognitive processes that facilitate novel problem solving, modification of behavior in response to environmental changes, planning and generating strategies for complex actions, and ability to override pre-potent behavioral and emotional responses to engage in goal-directed behavior.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 324 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 3%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 301 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 29%
Student > Master 43 13%
Researcher 40 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 10%
Student > Bachelor 29 9%
Other 55 17%
Unknown 33 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 182 56%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 7%
Neuroscience 15 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 4%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Other 29 9%
Unknown 54 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2009.
All research outputs
#5,369,818
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#507
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,251
of 93,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.