↓ Skip to main content

Preparation and characterization of nanocrystalline chromium boride

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Preparation and characterization of nanocrystalline chromium boride
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10853-006-0853-6
Authors

Li Qin, Xitian Zhang, Yao Liang, E. Zhang, Hong Gao, Zhiguo Zhang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 45%
Student > Master 3 27%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 36%
Materials Science 4 36%
Physics and Astronomy 2 18%
Chemical Engineering 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,557,454
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#940
of 4,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,564
of 56,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,636 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.