↓ Skip to main content

Carbon payments as a safeguard for threatened tropical mammals

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
336 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carbon payments as a safeguard for threatened tropical mammals
Published in
Conservation Letters, May 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2009.00059.x
Authors

Oscar Venter, Erik Meijaard, Hugh Possingham, Rona Dennis, Douglas Sheil, Serge Wich, Lex Hovani, Kerrie Wilson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Australia 4 1%
India 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 301 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 91 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 21%
Student > Master 47 14%
Other 24 7%
Student > Bachelor 19 6%
Other 52 15%
Unknown 32 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 138 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 121 36%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 40 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,239,656
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#593
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,803
of 104,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.